9
ABILITY
The Union Cabinet, on 19 October 2009, decided to sell 5 % shares of the public sector National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC) and 10 % of the Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd (SJVNL).
The Government said that the above decision was to enable share ownership of the people.
Actually, some people were given public money to buy the shares. Dr. Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister of India, Mrs. Pratibha Devising Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, and the Supreme Court knew this.
If the Government really wanted the people to own the shares of Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs), it could have reserved a definite amount of shares for every state. This is not an impossible object to achieve. This would have made the sales a constitutional one. But the Government is not doing this. Therefore, the sale is unconstitutional.
If the Union Ministers like Chithambaram, Pranab Mukergee, A.K. Antony want, they could reverse this decision even now.
If Pratibha Devisingh Patil wants, she could restrain the Government from going ahead with this decision.
Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, President of the Congress Party, too could ban such decisions.
If the learned judges of the Supreme Court were against cutting the precious head of the Constitution, they could also make the sale an unconstitutional one.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) also could dissuade the Government from going ahead with this policy.
Above all, the act of selling the shares without giving FREEDOM to the people to see this work is out and out unconstitutional.
The militant people killed two police men in the West Bengal State on 20 October 2009. On the same day, police killed three militant people in the Jharkhand State.
Apparently at the instance of the top industrial houses, the CBI, on 22 October 2009, raided the headquarters of the Department of Telecommunication for corruption of about Re.22000 crore to Re. 60,000 crore in the allotment of 2G spectrum by the present Government. Mr. A.Raja, Minister for Communication, retorted that the spectrum was allotted with the knowledge of Manmohan Singh.
One or two opposition parties demanded the resignation of Raja, and not Manmohan Singh.
The above demand prompted Raja to allege that the previous NDA Government under Vajpayee had allotted spectrum causing a loss of not less than Re. one lakh and sixty thousand crore. He disclosed that they- meaning Vajpayee, Advani, Arun Shourie, Arun Jaitly, Venkaiah Naidu and others – apportioned the spectrum among their men –without the approval of the Union Cabinet - as if it were their “ancestral property”. He added that a few new players were consciously introduced only to put an end to their monopoly.
Naturally, the above utterances of Raja prompted the beneficiaries, and the Supreme Court to devise various strategies to counter him. In order to keep the usurped spectrum in their hands, they, apparently, wanted to send Raja to jail.
Accordingly, the media mafia now approached some political leaders and published their views that went against him.
Some political leaders might have wanted the CBI to take action against Manmohan Singh. Some others might have considered this as an act of corruption at all levels. But their views were not published. Instead, the CBI indicated its decision to proceed against Raja.
Everyone knows that the orders flow from top to bottom and not vice versa. The moment Raja said that the spectrum was sold with the knowledge of Manmohan Singh, the CBI must have taken the case to its logical conclusion. Now, the CBI fishes where there are no fish.
The present writer had wanted the Union Government to delegate the question of giving the telephone licences to the State Governments to avoid favoritism. It was the seventh point of the first letter dated 1-6-2001. Had the suggestion been accepted, the common people in India would have been benefitted by more than Re. 5 lakh crore. Besides, the Union Government would have been free from such corruption charges.
Obviously, the words of Raja are complementary to this work. Now, anyone would recognize the importance of this work.
It must be noted that the Supreme Court - in the BALCO case - put the economic policy above judicial review. This judgment is perpetrating corruption in India. The nature of the calamities the Supreme Court drags down upon the nation could be gauged.
Here, the spectrum was given not based on any policy decision of the Union Cabinet. Surely the Union Cabinet under Vajpayee could not have taken a policy decision called - first come-first served - policy.
Chinese made soap and other articles worth Re. 20 lakh was found in Chennai port on 23 October 2009. This is not an act of smuggling by an individual for his day –to-day life. It is an organized crime committed by the people close to power. They must be brought to light. The act of buying illegally imported Chinese items must be deemed as an anti patriotic act.
Four militant people and four police personnel died in Chhattisgarh State on 25 October 2009.
A Minister of Sri Lanka, on 26 October 2009, said that Sri Lanka would not sign a defense pact with China.
It may be recalled that Sri Lanka, on 2 July 2009, compared India and China to two tracks on a railway line. This writer, in his letter No. 111 (Chapter-3) , wanted Sri Lanka to opt for either India or China. The firm stand taken by this writer is forcing Sri Lanka to talk like this.
Sri Lanka, on 25 October 2009, said that China was building a port and not a naval base in Sri Lanka. This is a misleading statement. It must be noted that a Chinese port in Sri Lanka is far more dangerous to India than a Chinese port in India. Therefore, Sri Lanka should not allow the naval vessels of other countries to enter its waters without the consent of India.
Army killed three militant people in Jammu & Kashmir State on 26 October 2009.
A meeting of the RIC (Russia, India and China) took place at Bangalore on 27 October 2009. China had asked Manmohan Singh not to visit Arunachal Pradesh. But the Foreign Minister of China visited India without any compunction.
Mr.TS. Vijayan, Chairman, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), on 30 October 2009, said that his organization had spent Re. one lakh crore in the last six months to buy shares. He disclosed this when Manmohan Singh and one or two other leaders talked about poverty alleviation.
Obviously, the public sector banks would spent not less than Re. five lakh crore to buy shares in this year. If allowed, they would give Re.10 lakh core more in the next six months. Next year, they would give about Re. 30 lakh crore – the double the amount of the Union Budget!
(Vijayan was not given extension when his 5-year term ended on 2 May 2011 presumably due to the above disclosure.)
Manmohan Singh has a firm faith in his ability to give this money to them as a reward for keeping him as the Prime Minister. Sonia Gandhi and the Cabinet Ministers must believe in their ability to use this money for large scale public investments.
The manipulators would always get a few people like Manmohan Singh to do this job for them. The secret of the strength of such people is their diabolical cunning. Therefore, the leaders like Dr. Karunanidhi, Chief Minister of the TN State, must remain in Delhi to prove their ability to put an end to this malpractice.
It may be re-called that it was the fourth point in the first letter dated 1-6- 2001. This writer has been showing the various facets of this issue for the last eight years with partial success only.
Queen Elizabeth handed over the Commonwealth Games Baton to Pratibha Devisingh Patil at Buckingham Palace on 29 October 2009. The former might have requested the latter to give FREEDOM to Indians.
Sri Lanka, on 29 October 2009, purchased vehicles worth Sri Lankan Re. 2049 crore from China. China gave this as loan. Sri Lanka should have purchased vehicles from India using the money donated it. Now, Sri Lanka is deliberately antagonizing India by buying things from China using Indian money. The people expect equal and opposite reaction from India.
The Director General of Hydrocarbons resigned on 29 October 2009 as the CBI found evidence of his nexus with private exploration companies. The resignation shows that the Government gave discovered oil and gas blocks to private companies.
On 30 October 2009, a woman Inspector of Police was arrested in Tamil Nadu (TN) State for receiving a bribe of Re.1500. If the “spectrum” had not gone into the hands of less than ten individuals, she would not have demanded money because of her higher salary income. Now, those who keep over Re. one lakh crore through simple manipulations have the last laugh.
On 31 October 2009 several Union Cabinet Ministers sat in front of Manmohan Singh forming a part of his audience. If he could not allow the Cabinet Minister to sit beside him in public meetings, they need not be invited.
After the last email, the Government is sparingly showing some Union Ministers in the public sector National and National News TV Channels. Yet, 50 per cent of the Ministers are not seen. They are shown in their respective states only.
The Cabinet Ministers belong to all Indians and all people must see them. Now, even High School students do not know their names and their policies.
Some Cabinet Ministers accompany Manmohan Singh like the members of the ministerial staff. This situation should not exist.
(Perhaps due to the above observation, Manmohan Singh discontinued this practice)
On 31 October 2009, the Department of Income Tax found evidence of unaccounted money after conducting country wide searches on nearly sixty properties of Mr. Madhu Koda, former Chief Minister of Jharkhand State.
Chithambaram, Union Minister, on 1 November 2009, said that the militant people in India have every right to seize power through democratic means. He vowed to eliminate militancy.
In this connection, it must be reiterated that the militant people cannot seize power so long as the Union Government transfers the natural resources to less than ten individuals.
The militant people of Nagaland, on 1 November 2009, said that they would not accept anything less than sovereignty. They would part with this demand, the moment the Union Government comes forward to give a share in the assets of the nation.
Now, the Government of Tamil Nadu State allotted Re.12 crore for the Sri Lankan refugees.
There is no threat to the life of Sri Lankan refugees in their home land now. Even if there were some threats, Indian army could protect them. Their absorption in India would create a vacuum in Sri Lanka. Therefore, they must go home. The Sri Lankan Government must find money for them. This is possible for Dr.Karunanidhi, Chief Minister of the TN State.
Notwithstanding anything, a man must have a firm faith in his ability. Then only he would do his duty. This is what the sages say.
The facts from 18 October 2009 to 2 November 2009 are being submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India on 3 November, 2009 through email. A copy is being sent by post. The website: www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com is also updated.
V.SABARIMUTHU
26-3 Thattankonam
Vellicode
Mulagumoodu PO
Kanyakumari District.
No comments:
Post a Comment