CHAPTER 3

3

A STABLE MIND

      Sri Lankan Tamils issue.

             Now there are reports that China wanted to use Sri Lankan ports. A Union Minister lamented that China was fishing in troubled waters.

              India allowed Sri Lanka to befriend China to secure the support of a veto power. By doing so, India compromised its own ‘National Security”. That phase is over. Now China must reckon the sensibilities of India in this matter.

        Sri Lanka gave a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) to a Company of China. India first gave mines to the Tamils. Now, India is helping Sri Lanka for its de-mining work. Sri Lanka intends to hand over the de-mined areas to China!

         Dr. Karunanidhi, Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu State  on 1 July 2009 said that a separate Tamil nation was not possible in Sri Lanka. He exhorted the people not to fuel the anger of Sri Lanka, lest the Tamils only would be affected. He pointed out that a leader in India had abandoned the demand for a separate nation when he had to choose between the existence of the party, and realizing a separate nation. He expressed the hope that one of the Tamils would, one day, become the Prime Minister of Sri Lanka. This is, perhaps, the reply of India to this work.

      In this connection, it must be stated that FREEDOM- and not Prime Minister ship- is the end of the state. There is no use in a slave becoming the Prime Minister of a country. Many from the North, West and South became the Prime Ministers of India. But everyone kept the people as mere slaves.

     One would say that there are many political leaders in India. But all are complementary to one another. There are alternatives but no rivals. The political leaders keep their rivals away from the eye of the people by controlling the press. Therefore, the people cannot even think of the rivals. Obviously, the Tamils would get FREEDOM only when the leaders in India get FREEDOM from the manipulators.

    Above all, India should not procrastinate to justify the circumstances that forced it to give military training to the Tamils. One would presume that India had sufficient reasons for the same. If India can not tell the real reasons now, it shall not hesitate to bring to justice the leaders responsible for the training. India should prove to the world that it did not play the game of children in Sri Lanka.

          Sri Lanka on 2 July 2009 described India and China as two tracks on a railway-line running independently. Sri Lanka must run on one line only. It must opt for either India or China. Sri Lanka could kill the Tamils because India wanted it. Now, it must realize that the FREEDOM of Sri Lanka would not be at the cost of the sovereignty of India.

              A member of the manipulation mafia –Mr. Ram- visited the Tamils in Sri Lanka on 3 July 2009. He described the killings as a rescue effort. When the Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF),  had started a war with the LTTE in the pretext of rescuing the Tamils, a writer of his magazine –a Mr. Subramonium- described the decision of India as “loss of institutional memory”. Thus, Mr. Ram indirectly says that India has no stable policy.

Economic matters

     The public sector Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) decided to invest Re. 40,000 crore in the stock market. Dr. Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister of India, is allowing the LIC to relapse into its deviant ways due to the lack of a stable policy. He is doing this to suppress free speech. The decision must be annulled as it is an unconstitutional one.

      The LIC could buy shares. But it must invest the money extracted from the Kashmir state in the companies located in that state only. If the LIC had followed this policy, the SPIC-a private sector company in the Tamil Nadu state- and the FACT- a public sector company in the Kerala state-would not have perished. There are two former Chief Ministers of Kashmir in the Union Cabinet. There are some other new members also. This is indeed an opportunity. When they fight for the rights of the people of their states, all others also would get their shares of money.

      The Union Government on 1 July 2009 raised the price of petrol. It must be noted that the new Union Cabinet did not give freedom to the people to buy and sell kerosene before taking the above decision.

              The media mafia on 3 July 2009 disclosed that the budget to be presented on 6 July 2009 envisaged the sale of the shares of even unlisted Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).

      In this connection, it must be noted that the government could not sell the shares of the PSUs mainly because of this work. No Government would repeat it without showing this work to the people. In this matter also, the Union Government has taken this decision to control the press. The Union Government should have a stable policy in this matter.

Militancy in India

            On 18 June 2009 the militant people killed two people in the West Bengal state. They said that they had taken control over 50 villages. Immediately, a war started between the army and the militant people. A number of people might have died due to this cannibalism. Yet the Government does not disclose the grievances of the militant people.

     On the same day, the militant people killed 9 Army personnel in the Orissa state.

The Supreme Court

             The Supreme Court on 29 June 2009 directed the UP State Government to give the reason for the policy of spending public money –about Re.2000 crore –for opening memorials and statues of the past and present leaders. The order was passed after a Union Minister had described the decision of the UP Government as “shame.”

         In this connection, it must be noted that the Union Government had taken a decision to give Re.two lakh and fifty thousand crore to two or three boys. The decision had been taken to control the press. This enables the leaders to reserve the front row seats in Parliament generation after generation. This helps the leaders to name the new buildings and schemes after the names of their ancestors. Similarly, the Government hands over the natural resources to private parties to control free speech. 

Indo-China relations

            It is true that India must know its weakness. But India should not fail to realize its strength also. If India wants freedom to the Tamils in Sri Lanka, they will get it. Many countries would support India. Even China would not use its veto. In the event of China defying India, the latter would be constrained to cut its relationship with the former. Therefore, Chinese naval vessels could visit the ports in Sri Lanka only with the consent of India.

           China had been developing friendship with Pakistan when India had been maintaining animosity with China. Now China should not think of converting Sri Lanka into another Pakistan.

    India depends on China not only for machines but also for toys. Therefore, China must choose either India or Sri Lanka.

  The words of a sage.

          Notwithstanding everything, a man must possess a stable mind. Then only he would do his duty. This is what a sage said.

 

      The facts from 18 June 2009 to 3 July 2009 are being submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 4 July 2009 through email. The website: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com also is being updated.

V.SABARIMUTHU

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu

PIN :629167